January 13, 2003 | ||
---|---|---|
View 36c29ffa39
- Changed my PGP fingerprint - Added Juha HeinanenJan Janak authored on 13/01/2003 03:17:16 |
January 11, 2003 | ||
---|---|---|
View 9133546c7e
more foobar addedJiri Kuthan authored on 11/01/2003 00:31:01 |
January 9, 2003 | ||
---|---|---|
View 625b72e0e6
[msuri] addedJiri Kuthan authored on 09/01/2003 10:25:48 |
January 8, 2003 | ||
---|---|---|
View 9cd60a0081
initial technical memos submittedJiri Kuthan authored on 08/01/2003 14:01:52 |
January 7, 2003 | ||
---|---|---|
View 4306713733
clarifications on accounting and stateful UAS addedJiri Kuthan authored on 07/01/2003 23:35:37 |
||
View 06415a6a40
warning about script/database incompatibilities with previous versions introduced; we still owe database upgrade instructionsJiri Kuthan authored on 07/01/2003 23:00:02 |
||
View ceab6d025d
seruser to-do update, new tmemo section introduced for design notes -- it should on-fly document design decisions we have been makingJiri Kuthan authored on 07/01/2003 11:08:33 |
||
View 19f0eec171
typos fixed and a clarification on MSM authentication bug workaround addedJiri Kuthan authored on 07/01/2003 01:14:37 |
January 6, 2003 | ||
---|---|---|
View 8ba9c56733
bug_fix: on_negative_reply now sets msg id and transaction context (previously, it didn't do so, which resulted in a lookup that consumed CPU and even worse, refcounted -- transaction that entered reply_route was never released)Jiri Kuthan authored on 06/01/2003 12:48:56 |
||
View eaf10d3693
t_unsafe_reply deprecatedJiri Kuthan authored on 06/01/2003 03:55:41 |
||
View 0afe6b05bd
on_negative_reply faked msg now copied from shmem msg (as opposed to zero-ing) -- more "read-only" actions (exec in particular) will work from reply_route; caution, rw actions may append some pkg stuff to msg, which will possibly be never released (shmem is released in a single block)Jiri Kuthan authored on 06/01/2003 03:04:47 |
||
View bbe743a131
added: 1) NAT traversal howto 2) From checking howto 3)FIFO/ul_add exampleJiri Kuthan authored on 06/01/2003 01:17:13 |
January 5, 2003 | ||
---|---|---|
View c082a4372f
SIGPIPE is ignored now; under some unclear circumstances, use of exec raised the signal, which then terminated ser; I'm not aware of any SIGPIPE customers, so it should be okJiri Kuthan authored on 05/01/2003 23:28:55 |
||
View 6db0151d4e
more exec examples, missed calls howtoJiri Kuthan authored on 05/01/2003 23:00:01 |
||
View ea828a3968
troubleshooting section addedJiri Kuthan authored on 05/01/2003 21:10:46 |